Compliance evidence that collects itself.

Compliance work happens in a burst six weeks before the audit: screenshots of cloud settings and access review exports, gathered by hand. A screenshot proves the control was in place on the day it was taken. It says nothing about the other 364 days.

Then it repeats: SOC 2 in Q1, ISO 27001 in Q3, NIS2 on its own timeline. The controls overlap heavily. The evidence-gathering rarely does.

Compliance evidence is a by-product of security operations you already run. SOC 2 CC7.1 wants evidence of vulnerability detection and Kervo AI is scanning continuously. ISO 27001 A.8.8 wants the same data. Activating a framework starts a mapping, not an evidence-collection project.

When a control drifts, you are told what changed and how to put it back. One control often satisfies several frameworks, so encryption at rest is evidenced once and counted against SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS and GDPR.

Activate a framework and Kervo AI maps its existing monitoring to that framework's controls immediately, showing coverage and open gaps from day one. Evidence collection runs through the same read-only integrations used for security monitoring, so there is nothing separate to deploy.

Controls that cannot be evidenced automatically, such as policy documents or training records, are tracked as manual controls with an owner and a review cadence.

Kervo AI replaces the technical evidence layer: configuration monitoring, access reviews, vulnerability management, encryption and logging verification, change tracking. It does not replace policy version control, questionnaire distribution at scale or a specific auditor's portal. Enterprise plans export evidence into those.