Multi-framework support
SOC 2 Type I and II, ISO 27001:2022, GDPR, NIS2, PCI DSS v4, HIPAA, NIST CSF 2.0, Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus, run together without duplicating work. Custom frameworks on Enterprise.
Kervo AI checks controls continuously, collects evidence from cloud, identity and infrastructure, and maps each piece to every framework it satisfies. Drift becomes a notification instead of a finding.
Six weeks before the audit, someone starts collecting screenshots of cloud settings and access reviews from systems never designed to produce evidence. A screenshot proves a point in time. It says nothing about the other 364 days, including the week a bucket policy was widened to unblock a deploy and never reverted.
Then the next framework asks the same questions in a different order.
Activate your frameworks and Kervo AI maps its existing monitoring to their controls. Because it already watches your cloud, identity, vulnerabilities, network and vendors, most evidence is data it already holds: gathered continuously, timestamped, organised by control.
Controls are checked constantly. When one drifts, you are told what changed and how to put it back. One control often satisfies several frameworks, so encryption at rest is evidenced once and counted against all of them.
SOC 2 Type I and II, ISO 27001:2022, GDPR, NIS2, PCI DSS v4, HIPAA, NIST CSF 2.0, Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus, run together without duplicating work. Custom frameworks on Enterprise.
Evidence pulled from your cloud providers, identity provider, code repositories and Kervo AI's own monitoring. Timestamped, organised by control, always current.
Continuous checking instead of periodic sampling. A control that falls out of compliance triggers a notification with the change, the timestamp, who made it where available, and how to fix it.
A complete package for any active framework, generated when you want it: coverage, evidence inventory, open gaps and documented risk acceptances, formatted for an auditor.
Accepted risks tracked with justification, approver and expiry, and surfaced in reports with context. A documented exception shows a functioning risk process. An unexplained gap shows the opposite.
Compliance evidence is mostly a by-product of security operations you already run. SOC 2 CC7.1 wants vulnerability detection and Kervo AI is scanning continuously. ISO 27001 A.8.8 wants the same data. Access reviews need identity data Kervo AI already ingests.
So evidence needs a mapping, not a collection exercise, and Kervo AI maintains that mapping. Activate a framework and coverage appears immediately from data already held.
Validate proves the posture holds. It does not run the program: decide where budget goes, tell the board what the risk is, or connect the stages so they run without people carrying data between them. Orchestrate does that, then hands back to Know.
SOC 2 Type I and II, ISO 27001:2022, GDPR, NIS2, PCI DSS v4, HIPAA, NIST CSF 2.0, Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus, with more added regularly. Custom frameworks on Enterprise.
Yes. Coverage reflects whatever is connected and grows as you connect more.
For most mid-market teams, yes. Enterprise plans can also export evidence into one you keep for policy or auditor workflow.
Frameworks overlap heavily. Kervo AI maps each evidence item to every control it satisfies, so encryption at rest is evidenced once and counted against SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS and GDPR.
You are notified as it happens, with the change, the affected controls across every framework, and the remediation.
Connect your environment and we'll show you live coverage against your frameworks, and exactly which gaps are open today.