[ Compare ]Kervo AI vs the alternatives
Why choose us
One loop versus
everything else
Point tools, acquired suites, spreadsheets. How one data model compares.
[ vs. a stack of disconnected tools ]
a stack of disconnected tools
A vendor each for discovery, prioritisation, leak monitoring, cloud posture, vendor risk and compliance
Kervo AI
One loop, one data model
A contract, a dashboard and a truth per tool
One platform, one contract, one risk picture
The same asset counted differently everywhere
One asset graph every stage reads and writes
Findings reconciled by hand
Findings correlate on their own, reason attached
A person per tool, or tools nobody runs
AI agents handle investigation, evidence and reporting
[ vs. a platform assembled by acquisition ]
a platform assembled by acquisition
Suites where each module was once a separate company
Kervo AI
One loop, one data model
Modules that share a login, not a data model
Built as one system from day one
Correlation added later, as another module
Correlation is how the platform works
Priorities depend on which module you opened
Priorities driven by reachability across everything
Single-vendor concentration risk
Sits above the tools you keep; swap any without losing the picture
[ vs. spreadsheets and quarterly bursts ]
spreadsheets and quarterly bursts
Scanner exports, a tracker and a compliance folder
Kervo AI
One loop, one data model
Sorted by CVSS, thousands deep
Reranked by reachability, exploit maturity and impact
Risk visible once a quarter, if someone builds the deck
Posture live every day, board-ready on demand
Evidence screenshotted before the audit
Evidence collects itself; drift is an alert
Progress measured in closed tickets
Progress measured in risk that dropped
[ Side by side ]
Capability by capability
| Capability | Disconnected tools | Acquired suite | Kervo AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data model | |||
| One asset graph across every capability | Partial | ||
| Automatic cross-signal correlation | Partial | ||
| Prioritization | |||
| Real attack paths to critical assets | Add-on | ||
| Reason attached to every priority | |||
| Operations | |||
| AI agents for investigation and reporting | Add-on | ||
| Continuous compliance on the same data | Separate module | ||
| AI CISO board-ready reporting | |||
| Commercials | |||
| Contracts to manage | One per tool | 1 | 1 |
| Works above the tools you already run | n/a | Sometimes | |
| Same foundations on every tier | Varies | ||
Get startedSee the difference
See the difference
on your own environment
We connect read-only to your environment and show what's actually there: attack paths, coverage gaps and compliance position.